Far cry 3's writer argues critics largely missed the point of the game
Far Cry 3 does a lot of things right. It's fun to play, the island setting is beautiful, sneaking around is a lot of fun, gunplay is solid, and everything works well.
But the story… well, the story has some issues. As I pointed out in my reviewthe unevenness and general kinda dumbness of the narrative is the thing that holds Far Cry 3 back from "we'll still talk about this in five years" glory. I'm midway through my second playthrough, and the problems with the story are more apparent than ever. It's never terrible and at times is perfectly enjoyablebut the storytelling is often lazy, sometimes irritating, occasionally offensive, and never manages to come together into a unified vision.
And the ending just flat-out stinks. However, with a single change to the story, Ubisoft could have addressed almost every problem the game's story has.
Far cry 6: vaas returns as the smuggler in surprise ending scene
Not only that, Far Cry 3 's story could have gone from "forgettable romp" to "everyone is calling this the best story of the year. Surely you aren't about to suggest your own ending while ignoring all of the development hurdles that make writing a video game so uniquely difficult? Yes, I'm afraid I am. Indulge me for a moment, and let's imagine what might have been. We're going to have some big ol' Far Cry 3 spoilers in here. So, those are the main problems with the story, as I see 'em.
But here's the thing: The entire story could have been salvaged by a simple decision, a plot point I felt was telegraphed throughout the entire game, and which I was perplexed never came to pass:. Halfway through the game, it's revealed that you're not Jason.
All far cry 6 endings explained
You never were. You're Vaas. This could've been made to work with the existing content in a of ways. Let's say the entire first half of the game is an elaborate hallucination brought on by, I don't know, torture and imprisonment.
How about this: Vaas was a successful worker for Hoyt until his power over the island grew too strong, and he pissed Hoyt off by failing to kill an American kid who escaped him. An American named Hang on, hold on, okay.
Get the best of revitaslimreview.com sent to your inbox. you'll never miss a thing
Back up. That image is from the handbook in the game. Let's see here. Here we've got this guy:. One looks like a bad mother, probably crazy enough that he could cause some damage.
Far cry 6 secret ending
The other looks like a grade-A doof. I don't mean to say that the doof's story can't be interesting, but it'd be more interesting to tell us the doof is the hero, then pull the rug out from under us. Back to making stuff up. The particulars of this aren't really that important; there are a handful of ways that the twist could be made to work. Here's one: Hoyt had Vaas tortured and imprisoned, where Vaas relived his downfall through the imagined eyes of his nemesis, recreating Jason's exploits and greatly exaggerating his prowess.
As it turns out, Jason just sort of got lucky and evaded Vaas—but in Vaas' twisted mind, Jason was granted magical powers by Vaas' sister Citra and became an all-powerful Rambo. How else could he have eluded Vaas for so long? At the point in the story when Jason kills Vaas, instead of dying, Vaas re-awakens and it's revealed that Vaas actually killed Jasonand you take control of Vaas. You break out of Hoyt's prison and spend the remainder of the game taking down Hoyt and conquering the island. Maybe there's a sequence where you kill Jason's friends.
Not only would this be one of the boldest, most talked-about narrative twists of the last few years, it would solve so many of the problems listed above. We wouldn't have to swallow the idea that an untrained twentysomething rando could take down an entire army. The disdain shown to the islanders would make more sense, given that we're seeing everything through Vaas' eyes. The tonal inconsistencies would be turned on their he, and it'd match with the kinda cheesy, pop-dark vibe of the game.
The moment we assumed the role of a gleeful villain, it would be much easier to shoot, burn, and pillage our way through the Rook Islands. The white savior thing from the first half would dissolve into irony. The asshole main characters would all get killed, thank god, and our vendetta against Hoyt would feel less abrupt. And best of all, the game would really feel like it was about something: About insanity and dominance, about taking what you want and using it to take more.
The more I think about it, the more I'm surprised Far Cry 3 didn't go this route. Even the menu and loading screens play with the idea of duality: Fading, Rorschach-like inkblots of Vaas and Jason blend into one another.
The "characters" screen of the game's handbook shows Vaas standing behind Jason, with a gun pointed at his head. Even the cover of the game prominently features Vaas, with Jason or someone? I don't know about you, but if I saw far cover and knew nothing about the game, I'd guess it was about the guy in the red tanktop. Every time the two characters meet, there's this weird tension, like we're not being told the whole story. How is Jason surviving all this, again?
Why is Vaas talking about the definition of insanity, and how that means doing things over, and over, and over? As Vaas lectures Jason about family, love and madness; as Jason wanders through hallucinations and sees Vaas at every corner, every Fight Club alarm in my brain went off. Surely I am this guy, ending But nope. Apparently Vaas is just some jerk who sort of dies in a dream sequence.
Putting my pie-in-the-sky imaginary endings aside for a minute, my broader point is that many games, even good ones like Far Cry 3could be taking more risks and telling more interesting stories. Considering the high level of across-the-board talent responsible for Far Cry 3it doesn't seem out of line to have hoped for more. We're definitely trying to question what a game is, and I think that's what Far Cry 2 did as well, where they tried to explore the limits of video games. And our game cry about video games to a huge degree, and about what you expect from video games, and how we change things up.
When I heard "change things up" and "subverting video game cliches," I was expecting something truly surprising.
What I got were some well-written characters, a couple of quality drug trips, a helicopter minigun sequence lifted from Apocalypse Now and a final moral choice that made no sense. I have never played a game where I have been thrilled by the amazing story telling aspect. The A. By Kirk Hamilton. Shop at Kinja Deals. I read books for great stories.
I play games for fun mechanics. I have played a lot of games.